Historically these compounds were among first conducting polymers synthesized
and they remain the best understood with respect to their structural
ordering[]. Specific examples of these polymers are
shown in Fig. 1 and include polyacetylene (PA), poly(p-phenylene
vinylene) (PPV), poly(p-phenylene) (PPP), polythiophene (PT) and
polypyrrole (PPy). The majority of these compounds exhibit crystalline phases
which adopt a herringbone equatorial packing (a packing motif common to many
conventional linear polymers such as polyethylene and polypropylene) within an
orthorhombic or monoclinic unit cell as shown in Fig. 2. Hence there are two
polymer chains per projected two-dimensional (2D) equatorial unit cell with
p2gg symmetry. The average angular orientation of the polymer chains' major
axis, with respect to an equatorial lattice vector (typically a), is
specified by the setting angle . Table I
summerizes representative reported values for the various unit cell parameters.
The ratio,
, is particularly noteworthy for it often falls
near a value of
, especially for PA and PPV. Hence the lattice
formed by the equatorial projection of the polymer chain centers closely
approximates that of a triangular grid.
![]() |
For some conducting polymers the net crystallinity can be quite large and
values exceeding 80% have been reported[13]. Coherence lengths,
i.e. the distances over which Bragg periodicity is maintained, are rather
modest with typical values ranging from 50Å to 200Å depending on the
specifics of the polymer sample[14], the particular synthesis
route and any additional processing procedures. In addition to these
characteristics there can be pronounced fluctuations in the axial chain to
chain registry (parallel to the chain axes) between neighboring chains so that
there is appreciable paracrystallinity[15]. This type of disorder
is typically inferred from systematic diffuse components along scattering
profiles within the various non-equatorial () layer
lines[16]. These properties, when combined with the powder
averaging by polycrystalline mats which typify as-prepared films or powders
severely reduce the overall distinguishability of individual diffraction peaks.
In many cases, further processing can introduce uniaxial, biaxial, or higher
order orientation of the crystallites[17]. Despite these
complications standard crystallographic analysis methods are
possible[17] and significant amounts of structural detail can be
discerned from pristine and doped hosts.